|
This is a bibliography of major works on the history of Ontario, Canada. ==General== * (''The Dictionary of Canadian Biography'' ) (1966–2006), thousands of scholarly biographies of notables who died by 1930 * (''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2008) ) reliable detailed encyclopedia, on-line free * ''Celebrating One Thousand Years of Ontario's History: Proceedings of the Celebrating One Thousand Years of Ontario's History Symposium, April 14, 15, and 16, 2000.'' Ontario Historical Society, 2000. 343 pp. * Baskerville, Peter A. ''Sites of Power: A Concise History of Ontario.'' Oxford U. Press., 2005. 296 pp. (first edition was ''Ontario: Image, Identity and Power,'' 2002). (online review ) * Chambers, Lori, and Edgar-Andre Montigny, eds. ''Ontario Since Confederation: A Reader'' (2000), articles by scholars * Hall, Roger; Westfall, William; and MacDowell, Laurel Sefton, eds. ''Patterns of the Past: Interpreting Ontario's History.'' Dundurn Pr., 1988. 406 pp. * McGowan, Mark George and Clarke, Brian P., eds. ''Catholics at the "Gathering Place": Historical Essays on the Archdiocese of Toronto, 1841-1991.'' Canadian Catholic Historical Assoc.; Dundurn, 1993. 352 pp. * McKillop, A. B. ''Matters of Mind: The University in Ontario, 1791-1951.'' U. of Toronto Press, 1994. 716 pp. * Mays, John Bentley. ''Arrivals: Stories from the History of Ontario.'' Penguin Books Canada, 2002. 418 pp. * Ruth Arndt (Spence). “Prohibition in Canada: A Memorial to Francis Stephens Spence. Ed. F. S.Spence”. Toronto: Ontario Branch of the Dominion Alliance for the Total Suppression of the Liquor Traffic (1919), 105-138, 381-400. Examines the temperance movement and political platforms towards prohibition. * Malcolm Bird. Bird, Malcolm G."Alberta's and Ontario's Liquor Boards: Why such Divergent Outcomes?"Canadian Public Administration 53.4 (2010): 509-530. A case study between Ontario and Alberta regarding privatization of liquor. * Morris Fish. "The Effect of Alcohol on the Canadian Constitution ...Seriously." McGill Law Journal. 57.1 09; 2011: 189+. The author focuses on prohibition as a vital event that lead courts to be modernized. * Gerald Hallowell.“Prohibition in Ontario, 1919-1923”. Ottawa, Love Printing Service, 1972: 3-18, 150-152. Mainly focuses on the election platforms of prohibition and was critical of the E.C Drury government. * Murray Johnston. “E.C. Drury: Agrarian Idealist”.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986: 1-4, 158-160, 196, 200-202. A biography of E.C Drury Premier of Ontario 1919-1923. * Dan Malleck. “Try to Control Yourself: The Regulation of Public Drinking in Post-Prohibition Ontario, 1927-44”. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 2012: xv-xvi, 240-245. A book that defends the creation of the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. * Dan Malleck. "An Innovation from Across the Line: The American Drinker andLiquor Regulation in Two Ontario Border Communities, 1927–1944." Journal of Canadian Studies 41.1 (2007): 151-171. Ontario prohibition not only a provincial problem but also affected the relationship between the United States and Canada. * Peter Nesbitt. "G. Howard Ferguson: Ontario Tory”. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977, 138-139, 158-60, 277-279. A biography of G. Howard Ferguson Premier of Ontario 1923-1930. * Christina Blizzard. “Right Turn :How the Tories Took Ontario” Toronto: DundurnPress, 1995. * Monica Gattinger and Diane St Pierre. “The ‘Neoliberal Turn’ in Provincial CulturalPolicy and Administration in Québec and Ontario: The Emergence of‘Quasi-Neoliberal’ Approaches.” CanadianJournal of Communication. 35: 2 (June 29, 2010) * Roger Keil. “‘Common–Sense’ Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada.” Antipode. 34: 3 (2002): 578–601. *Sharon Anne Jaeger. "(From Control to Customer Service: Government Control of Liquor in Ontario, 1927-1972 )". ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 2000. Examination of post-Prohibition alcohol policy in Ontario, and the inconsistent and often contradictory roles of the government’s two alcohol-related organs, the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) and the Liquor License Board of Ontario (LLBO). Explores impact of social movements and popular opinion upon legislative decision-making, as well as industry lobbying and broader social context. Argues that Ontario’s incrementalist approach to policy-making was often challenged by the need for rapid change in alcohol policy, and examines the government’s attempts to construct hasty compromises. Posits that the continued existence of the LCBO past the time when it was a large contributor to net general revenue indicates not only its importance as a patronage tool and means to appease powerful alcohol producers, but also represents a reflection of government’s enduring belief that the restriction of market forces is permissible if it protects society. * Lukin Robinson. "The Ontario Election and After." MonthlyReview 47.9 (1996): 19. An analysis, from the perspective of asocialist, of the 1995 general election in Ontario and its impact on the economy and government. Focuses on the NDP’s failings as an effective government leading to its downfall and the Conservative’s victory. Critical of the approach to which the NDP and Liberals handled the election, and the Conservatives sweeping changes to social programs in pursuit of reducing provincial deficit. * Maeve Quaid. Workfare: Why Good Social Policy Ideas Go Bad.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002. An historical and comparative study of workfare as a social policy idea in the 1980s and 1990s. Compares six casestudies including California, Wisconsin, New York, Alberta, Ontario and New Brunswick and focuses on political agendas as the driving force behind such social policies. Establishes that workfare is largely unsuccessful due to the failures of policy makers in implementation; unions, special interest groupsand other resistors; and little public attention and support. Concludes thatthe difficulties and hazards found in the workfare example can similarly be foundin other social policy ideas in the areas of education, child care, healthcare, pensions and unemployment insurance. Argues that before established practice can be reformed, understanding of these hazards and possible solutionsmust be found. * Sid Noel. Essays on Governing Ontario: Revolution at Queen’s Park. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company, 1997. A collection of essays and empirical studies examining the Ontario election in 1995. Discusses a variety of factors contributing to the Conservative victory including TV advertising campaigns, electoral behaviour, a change in Ontario’s political culture, and economic and political history. Notes the appeal of fiscal accountability and platforms that cover a variety of areas of policy. * Ernie S. Lightman. “It’s Not a Walk in the Park: Workfare in Ontario.” Workfare: Ideology for a New Under-Class. Edited by Eric Shragge.Toronto: Garamond Press, 1997. An analysis of workfare as implemented in Ontario after the Conservative victory in 1995. Looks at welfare reform under the Liberal and NDP governments, compares the Liberal’s Red Book to the Conservative’s Common Sense Revolution and what they meant for the 1995 election, and finally examines the effect of workfare in Ontario post-election.Concludes that workfare does not do much more than create obligatory tasks for welfare dependents. Instead, it helps dismantle ‘big’ government and the social services it provides, all to the benefit of corporations and the wealthy. * Bob Hebdon and Peter Warrian. “Coercive Bargaining: Public Sector Restructuring Under the Ontario Social Contract, 1993-1996.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52.2 (1999): 196-212. An empirical study of the 1993 NDP government’s Social Contract Act mandating spending reductions. Focuses on the approach to restructuring that the Social Contract takes paying particular attention to unionization and collective bargaining and cooperativeness between labour and management. Concludes by arguing that optimal restructuring outcomes were achieved when the collective concerns of workers were heard. Further states that majority of local unions and managers were able to find compromise under the Social Contract Act which was not the case when compared to Conservative restructuring causing prolonged strikes. * Robert Drummond. “The Provincial Perspectives: Ontario.” Canadian Annual Review of Politics and Public Affairs, 1995. Edited by David Leyton-Brown. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002. An overview of the 1995 general election in Ontario and record of the Speech from the Throne as well as the first session of the 36th Ontario provincial parliament. Focuses on establishing the facts rather than an in depth analysis of the election; determines that the major issues of the election were welfare, taxand spending cuts, and employment equity. Notes that Conservative victory due to a platform with promises (unlike the NDP), no half measures (unlike the Liberals), the poor performance of the NDP incumbent government, a shrewd advertisement campaign, votes from Reform supporters, and NDP and Liberals attacking one another rather than the Conservatives. Concludes with a record of the new government quickly fulfilling its campaign promises allowing it continued major public support and the introduction of an omnibus bill proposing amendments to approximately 40 statutes. Such amendments included allowing the government to close hospitals, direct doctors to practice in certain areas, and facilitate the merger of municipal governments. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Bibliography of Ontario」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|